tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7257493550531569180.post6394970508941011868..comments2024-03-26T16:16:22.535+13:00Comments on AGAINST THE CURRENT: BROAD TELLS PORKIESUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7257493550531569180.post-60627622842873741892008-12-16T19:14:00.000+13:002008-12-16T19:14:00.000+13:00Thanks for that. $600 a week plus expenses, accord...Thanks for that. $600 a week plus expenses, according to the weekend SST story. Apparently Gilchrist runs http://www.nzscanners.org.nz/, which requires registration and password access simply to view the forums. A great way to harvest and pass on info on who listens in.<BR/><BR/>He's mentioned here back in 2003 as seeking the return of a stolen piece of gear:<BR/>http://www.nzart.org.nz/nzart/history/2003/INFOLINE-55.pdfJoe Whttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13770796703598222277noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7257493550531569180.post-77200792796578401072008-12-16T18:01:00.000+13:002008-12-16T18:01:00.000+13:00No, I don't discount that possibility. It would me...No, I don't discount that possibility. It would mean that there are 'rogue' elements within the police and that there is no effective 'chain of command'. Whatever the case, Broad is still doing a 'snow job'.<BR/>Incidentally Keith Locke said in Parliament today that the police were paying Gilchrist $600 a week.Steven Cowanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04352539377513132294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7257493550531569180.post-9571957983889356592008-12-16T17:43:00.000+13:002008-12-16T17:43:00.000+13:00You'd discount the possibility, then, that Broad i...You'd discount the possibility, then, that Broad is so ineffective that operatives such as Gilchrist's two detective "uncles" are barely supervised loose cannons?Joe Whttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13770796703598222277noreply@blogger.com