ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ is no longer just the insurgent congresswoman from the Bronx who rattled the Democratic establishment in 2018. She is now, according to recent polling, one of the most popular politicians in the United States.
In a political landscape dominated for decades by ageing white men, her rise signals something far more profound than a generational shift. It suggests that the Democratic Party may finally have a figure who represents a country seeking an end to the Trumpian nightmare and hungry for real change. And yet, if history is any guide, the greatest obstacle to her ascent may not be the Republican Party, but the entrenched conservative wing of her own party.
A recent survey found AOC ranked third most popular in political popularity, and she was one of only three leaders with a net positive image. The socialist congresswoman was beaten only by former President Barack Obama and his wife, former First Lady Michelle Obama. The survey highlighted that she continues to inspire enthusiasm across demographics that the Democrats have struggled to mobilise: young voters, working-class communities, and disillusioned progressives who have long felt alienated by the party’s centrist drift. AOC has the kind of grassroots following that could translate into a winning presidential election campaign.
But the Democratic Party establishment has never been kind to its left flank. Figures like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, who represent the cautious, donor-friendly wing of the party, have long viewed AOC and her allies as a threat to the Democratic Party's cosy relationship with Wall Street, corporate lobbyists, and the political donor class. The hostility is not subtle. From the moment she entered Congress, AOC was treated as a nuisance by party leadership, her Green New Deal dismissed as unrealistic, her calls for Medicare for All brushed aside as politically toxic. Yet the polling now suggests that it is precisely these bold, unapologetically progressive policies that resonate with the public. The establishment’s fear is not that she cannot win—it is that she might.
The Democratic Party has a long history of sabotaging its own insurgents. From George McGovern in 1972 to Bernie Sanders in 2016 and 2020, the party’s machinery has consistently closed ranks to protect its centrist core. The calculus is always the same: better to lose with a moderate than risk winning with a leftist who might actually govern against the interests of the donor class and might pursue policies that threaten the status quo. Unfortunately for the Democratic Party corporate leadership, used to having things their own way, AOC is no longer a fringe figure. She is a mainstream contender, and that terrifies the Schumers of the world,
What makes AOC’s possible bid for the Democratic presidential nomination so potent is that she represents the America of today, not the America of the 1990s that still seems to haunt Democratic strategists. She is a young Latina woman from a working-class background, a woman who speaks fluently about climate justice, racial inequality, and economic democracy. She is not yet another ageing white male offering incrementalism in a time of crisis. She is, instead, a candidate who embodies the urgency of a generation facing climate collapse, crushing student debt, and a housing crisis. She speaks of making a decisive break with the past and has been known to talk about the tension between reform and revolution. In a country where the median age is 38, it is absurd that the political class is dominated by septuagenarians and octogenarians clinging to power. AOC’s rise is a direct challenge to that gerontocracy.
But AOC'S popularity is not just because she is widely liked. It is rooted in the movements that have propelled her: the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), climate activists, labour organisers, and a new generation of voters who are tired of being told that their demands are unrealistic. A longtime member of the DSA, the backing of America's largest socialist organisation gives her an immediate campaign infrastructure that few other Democrats can match. Unlike the hollow campaign machines of centrist candidates, AOC’s base is built on genuine grassroots energy. That matters in an election where turnout will be decisive.
The mood in the United States is unmistakable. After years of economic inequality, political dysfunction, and climate disasters, the appetite for real change is overwhelming. The old centrist playbook—triangulation, incremental reforms, and appeals to bipartisanship—rings hollow in a country facing the authoritarianism of the Trump administration and with millions struggling to keep their heads above water. Ocasio-Cortez’s message, by contrast, is clear and uncompromising: the system is broken, and it must be transformed. Radically. That clarity is why she is surging in the polls while establishment figures flounder.
Younger voters, in particular, are less swayed by the old and tired arguments of career politicians that are little more than justifications for defending the status quo. They have lived through crisis after crisis, and they are not interested in being told to wait another decade for change. They see in figures like Ocasio-Cortez not a gamble, but a reflection of their own lives and aspirations. As she herself has said, 'For me, democratic socialism is about dignity. It’s about guaranteeing a basic level of dignity. It’s asserting the value of saying that the America we want is one in which all children can access a dignified education, in which no person is too poor to have the medicine they need to live. That is not radical—it is common sense.'
Of course, the knives will come out, and the smear campaigns will begin. The conservative Democratic cabal will do everything in its power to block her path. They will continue to claim that she is unelectable, that her policies are too radical, that she cannot win over suburban moderates. They will deploy the same tired arguments they used against Bernie Sanders, ignoring the fact that it is precisely their brand of 'pragmatic' moderation that has failed to inspire voters time and again. Not only that, they will try to paint her as divisive, even as she unites constituencies that the party has long neglected. And if history is any guide, they would even be prepared to swallow another defeat rather than allow a genuine progressive to take the reins.
But the establishment may be underestimating the moment. The crises are deeper, the inequalities starker, the electorate younger and more diverse. AOC’s rise is not a fluke—it is the logical outcome of a political system that has failed to deliver for the majority. If the Democratic Party insists on clinging to its centrist orthodoxy, it risks alienating the very voters it needs to survive. If it embraces Ocasio-Cortez, it has a chance to channel the energy of a movement that could reshape American politics for a generation.
The choice is stark. The Democrats can continue to be the party of Schumer, clinging to a failed status quo, or they can become the party of Ocasio-Cortez, embracing the future with boldness and conviction. The polls suggest the America people are ready. The question is whether the party will allow itself to be dragged, kicking and screaming, into the America of today.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated.